Skip to main content

Box 2

 Container

Contains 14 Results:

Box 2

 File — Box: 2
Identifier: Box 2
Scope and Contents From the Collection:

Norfolk attorney Archie L. Boswell acted as attorney for the defendants in the cases of James vs. Duckworth and James vs. Almond, the two cases to reopen the Norfolk schools closed to avoid integration as part of Virginia's Massive Resistance. This collection consists of his papers relating to those two cases, and includes various legal materials, correspondence, notes, background research, and other items.

Dates: circa 1958-1960

Folder 1: Correspondence, 1958 October-December

 File — Box: 2, Folder: 1
Identifier: Folder 1
Scope and Contents From the Collection:

Norfolk attorney Archie L. Boswell acted as attorney for the defendants in the cases of James vs. Duckworth and James vs. Almond, the two cases to reopen the Norfolk schools closed to avoid integration as part of Virginia's Massive Resistance. This collection consists of his papers relating to those two cases, and includes various legal materials, correspondence, notes, background research, and other items.

Dates: 1958 October-December

Folder 2: Correspondence, 1959 January-1960 June

 File — Box: 2, Folder: 2
Identifier: Folder 2
Scope and Contents From the Collection:

Norfolk attorney Archie L. Boswell acted as attorney for the defendants in the cases of James vs. Duckworth and James vs. Almond, the two cases to reopen the Norfolk schools closed to avoid integration as part of Virginia's Massive Resistance. This collection consists of his papers relating to those two cases, and includes various legal materials, correspondence, notes, background research, and other items.

Dates: 1959 January-1960 June

Folder 3: Court Papers, I, circa 1958-1960

 File — Box: 2, Folder: 3
Identifier: Folder 3
Scope and Contents From the Collection:

Norfolk attorney Archie L. Boswell acted as attorney for the defendants in the cases of James vs. Duckworth and James vs. Almond, the two cases to reopen the Norfolk schools closed to avoid integration as part of Virginia's Massive Resistance. This collection consists of his papers relating to those two cases, and includes various legal materials, correspondence, notes, background research, and other items.

Dates: circa 1958-1960

Folder 4: Court Papers, II, circa 1958-1960

 File — Box: 2, Folder: 4
Identifier: Folder 4
Scope and Contents From the Collection:

Norfolk attorney Archie L. Boswell acted as attorney for the defendants in the cases of James vs. Duckworth and James vs. Almond, the two cases to reopen the Norfolk schools closed to avoid integration as part of Virginia's Massive Resistance. This collection consists of his papers relating to those two cases, and includes various legal materials, correspondence, notes, background research, and other items.

Dates: circa 1958-1960

Folder 5: Trial Proceedings, circa 1958-1960

 File — Box: 2, Folder: 5
Identifier: Folder 5
Scope and Contents From the Collection:

Norfolk attorney Archie L. Boswell acted as attorney for the defendants in the cases of James vs. Duckworth and James vs. Almond, the two cases to reopen the Norfolk schools closed to avoid integration as part of Virginia's Massive Resistance. This collection consists of his papers relating to those two cases, and includes various legal materials, correspondence, notes, background research, and other items.

Dates: circa 1958-1960

Folder 6: Plaintiff's Trial Memorandum, circa 1958-1960

 File — Box: 2, Folder: 6
Identifier: Folder 6
Scope and Contents From the Collection:

Norfolk attorney Archie L. Boswell acted as attorney for the defendants in the cases of James vs. Duckworth and James vs. Almond, the two cases to reopen the Norfolk schools closed to avoid integration as part of Virginia's Massive Resistance. This collection consists of his papers relating to those two cases, and includes various legal materials, correspondence, notes, background research, and other items.

Dates: circa 1958-1960

Folder 7: Brief on Behalf of Defendants, circa 1958-1960

 File — Box: 2, Folder: 7
Identifier: Folder 7
Scope and Contents From the Collection:

Norfolk attorney Archie L. Boswell acted as attorney for the defendants in the cases of James vs. Duckworth and James vs. Almond, the two cases to reopen the Norfolk schools closed to avoid integration as part of Virginia's Massive Resistance. This collection consists of his papers relating to those two cases, and includes various legal materials, correspondence, notes, background research, and other items.

Dates: circa 1958-1960

Folder 8: Brief on Behalf of Petitioner, Harrison vs. Day, circa 1958-1960

 File — Box: 2, Folder: 8
Identifier: Folder 8
Scope and Contents From the Collection:

Norfolk attorney Archie L. Boswell acted as attorney for the defendants in the cases of James vs. Duckworth and James vs. Almond, the two cases to reopen the Norfolk schools closed to avoid integration as part of Virginia's Massive Resistance. This collection consists of his papers relating to those two cases, and includes various legal materials, correspondence, notes, background research, and other items.

Dates: circa 1958-1960

Folder 9: Background Information, circa 1958-1960

 File — Box: 2, Folder: 9
Identifier: Folder 9
Scope and Contents From the Collection:

Norfolk attorney Archie L. Boswell acted as attorney for the defendants in the cases of James vs. Duckworth and James vs. Almond, the two cases to reopen the Norfolk schools closed to avoid integration as part of Virginia's Massive Resistance. This collection consists of his papers relating to those two cases, and includes various legal materials, correspondence, notes, background research, and other items.

Dates: circa 1958-1960

Folder 10: Norfolk City Ordinances, circa 1958-1960

 File — Box: 2, Folder: 10
Identifier: Folder 10
Scope and Contents From the Collection:

Norfolk attorney Archie L. Boswell acted as attorney for the defendants in the cases of James vs. Duckworth and James vs. Almond, the two cases to reopen the Norfolk schools closed to avoid integration as part of Virginia's Massive Resistance. This collection consists of his papers relating to those two cases, and includes various legal materials, correspondence, notes, background research, and other items.

Dates: circa 1958-1960

Folder 11: Notes, Lists, circa 1958-1960

 File — Box: 2, Folder: 11
Identifier: Folder 11
Scope and Contents From the Collection:

Norfolk attorney Archie L. Boswell acted as attorney for the defendants in the cases of James vs. Duckworth and James vs. Almond, the two cases to reopen the Norfolk schools closed to avoid integration as part of Virginia's Massive Resistance. This collection consists of his papers relating to those two cases, and includes various legal materials, correspondence, notes, background research, and other items.

Dates: circa 1958-1960

Folder 12: Printed Materials, circa 1958-1960

 File — Box: 2, Folder: 12
Identifier: Folder 12
Scope and Contents From the Collection:

Norfolk attorney Archie L. Boswell acted as attorney for the defendants in the cases of James vs. Duckworth and James vs. Almond, the two cases to reopen the Norfolk schools closed to avoid integration as part of Virginia's Massive Resistance. This collection consists of his papers relating to those two cases, and includes various legal materials, correspondence, notes, background research, and other items.

Dates: circa 1958-1960

Folder 13: Duplicate Material, circa 1958-1960

 File — Box: 2, Folder: 13
Identifier: Folder 13
Scope and Contents From the Collection:

Norfolk attorney Archie L. Boswell acted as attorney for the defendants in the cases of James vs. Duckworth and James vs. Almond, the two cases to reopen the Norfolk schools closed to avoid integration as part of Virginia's Massive Resistance. This collection consists of his papers relating to those two cases, and includes various legal materials, correspondence, notes, background research, and other items.

Dates: circa 1958-1960